Which one of the following pairs is wrongly classified?
| Positive effect on the environment | Negative effect on the environment | |
| A | Incinerating rubbish in residential areas | Covering opened dust bins left out in the open |
| B | Breeding animals like chicken and sheep for food | Cutting down trees |
| C | Collecting rainwater for watering garden plants | Feeding animals in the wild |
| D | Using recycled material | Leaving unfinished food at the canteen table |
Ans 7:
Class : Class 5
The question says " Which of the following PAIRS are wrongly classified? " They are referring to multiple effects, not individual effects.
Ans 8:
Class : Class 4
people who think this question is stupid those people are STUPID so you, so called Albert Einstein i say you are STUPID . STUPID STUPID STUPID these kids think they are Albert Einstein
Ans 10:
Class : Class 6
they are not stupid question, they are just easy. well if i tell you how much does the sky weigh, will you be able to tell me the answer without looking at google? The obious answer will be no. so don't say it stupid unless or until you are albert einstein. you can say it is easy but not stupid.
Ans 11:
Class : Class 4
All that air, the entire atmosphere, weighs about 5 million billion tons! We don't get crushed because all that weight is distributed evenly over the entire surface of the Earth. The average force you feel is about 15 pounds on every square inch of your body. air's weight copied from google
Ans 14:
Ans 19:
Ans 21:
Class : Class 9
Master Answer Admin from Revisewise pls. help us in this question. In Option B both are wrongly classified. In Option C the point under 'Negative effect on environment' is wrongly classified. How can feeding wild animals have negative effect? Pls. explain pls. explain. I agree with what the answer is (i.e. A) but B and C also have at least 1 point that is wrongly classified.